|
Reviewers
aren’t always the smartest lot. We are just people after
all.
That’s my best excuse for panning the first part of the
five-part Spore by Michel Gagné, which has been the back-up tale in
DC’s Detective Comics for the past few months. I looked at his work,
from my mainstream superhero bias and just had no idea what to make
of it. And as open-minded as I may think myself to be, sometimes as
a reviewer I pan that which I do not understand. It’s not something
I’m proud of, but it happens.
But I learned a lesson from it.
When I reviewed the second part, in which I was a tad more receptive
to it, Gagné himself dropped me a note. I’ll be honest, for the most
part we reviewers work in a vacuum. Rarely do readers or the
creators themselves feel the need or inclination to contact the
reviewer. And as a result when reviewing the work, particularly when
you’re the guy with the “offhand opinions,” you may not take all
that needs to be evaluated into consideration.
For one, I
didn’t have an inkling of Gagné’s background. From my limited
understanding, he was a children’s author. That is just one thing
he’s done.
Had I done just the most cursory of searches, I
could have found out a great deal about Gagné’s career, as detailed
at Gagné International Press. Here’s his bio:
“Michel Gagné was born in Québec,
Canada, in 1965. He studied animation at Sheridan College School of
Visual Arts in Ontario, Canada.
In 1985, he began a highly
successful career drawing characters and special effects for
animated and live-action feature films. His 3 _ minute independent
short film, "Prelude to Eden", is a favorite among animation
students and teachers, and has played in festivals throughout the
world. Michel was honored by the International Animated Film
Society, ASIFA-Hollywood, with four Annie Award nominations. He
continues to design and consult on major motion pictures.
In
addition to his film work, Michel has experimented in a variety of
mediums including sculptures, paintings and mixed medias. His work
continues to be exhibited in local galleries. Michel and his beloved
wife created GAGNÉ International Press, in 1998. He's been writing,
illustrating, and publishing books and comics ever
since.”
What really astounded me while touring the website,
was the extent he’s explored various mediums to express his artistic
voice as shown in his gallery, including sculptures, CD covers, collage
& ink, tattoo design and paintings. It seems there’s almost no
outlet he hasn’t explored. And you’ve most likely seen some of his
work without realizing it through his animation (as he’s been
involved in numerous films since 1985), but most recently The Iron
Giant and Osmosis Jones.
In animation circles as noted in his
bio, Gagné is lauded for his animated short, Prelude to Eden. The
work offers a theory to the origin of the Big Bang. Not many
animated shorts open with a quote from theoretical physicist Tullio
Regge. But this one does: “We think of the Big Bang as a fraction of
time, but in this fraction the most incredible things may have
happened…”
Gagné is known among wiser comic book critics than
myself, for ZED. Zed is this little adorable genius that wants to
help his universe through the invention of a new energy source. As
his parents and friends attend the unveiling and demonstration of
the device, with one flip of the switch Zed kills an entire planet
(except for himself, as he escapes and the story goes from there).
Zed would have been the perfect introduction for me, before reading
the Spore arc. Why? Well because Zed is the perfect mixture to
display Gagné unique storytelling style and sense of humor. One
minute I may be touched by a scene, the next you’re
bewildered.
And I think that’s how Gagné likes it. He likes
to challenge his audience and keep them on their toes. He has an
ability to make the beautiful appear grotesque, as well as equally
revealing the beauty of disgusting imagined characters. Consider how
his 2001 book Insanely Twisted Rabbits came about, as explained
in the books introduction:
“The story of these strange
rabbits began sometime in 1991, while I was working at Don Bluth
Animation Studios in Burbank, California. One day, I entered the
room of my friend and co-worker Dave Kupczyk, as I often did, and
saw a drawing of a rabbit he had done. The drawing was a
semi-realistic portrait of his pet rabbit with oversized fangs. Dave
smiled and said "That's Fudge, evil fudge!" I went back to my desk
and scribbled a picture of an enraged deformed mutated rabbit. I
brought the drawing to Dave and said, "Now that's an evil Fudge!"
From this point on I was hooked! Every time I had a minute
between assignments and during my breaks, I doodled more deformed
rabbits. Dave quickly joined me and the whole thing became a kind of
contest of who would draw the most bizarre creature. Dave kept on
pinning each new drawing to the walls of his room and eventually his
work environment was filled with strange rabbits. The word got
around the studio and people frequently came to visit his room to
see the latest creations.
We each did fifty rabbits before
Don Bluth Studios closed down at the end of 1992. Dave and I parted
ways, but somehow the "rabbit project" did not die. I kept my
sketches with the idea of one day publishing a weird rabbit
sketchbook. Dave on the other end had a more ambitious goal. He
started painting each one in full color as well as designing a
layout for a high quality coffee table art book entitled "100
Insanely Twisted Rabbits". I sincerely hope that Dave gets his
version published some day. In the meantime here are my
sketches.”
More recently, in 2002’s Frenzied Fauna: From A to
Z, Gagné expanded his vision of the animal kingdom through 26
characters. I agree with the back cover copy of this (his sixth)
book, which says: “Never before has there been a menagerie so wild,
wonderful, winsome—and weird.” My vote for the most weird (but
wonderful) is the Hideous Horse.
But I think my favorite book
by Gagné is A Search for Meaning: The Story of Rex. The back
cover succinctly captures what indeed is a quite complex (and at the
same time simple) story of one animal’s quest for knowledge: “Follow
the adventures of the cute and curious Rex. He travels far and wide
in an ever so strange and visually fanciful world. Rex shows us how
we can step back to our innocence, and see that ‘meaning’ is found
everywhere and nowhere. Rex's story is one for all seasons and ages.
It is fun, silly, scary, cute and spiritual all rolled into one
sweet little face.”
As I said, as much as Gagné intentionally
seeks out to un-nerve the reader, in this story of Rex, he seeks to,
on another level, endear the reader. But at the same time he pulls
no punches, using the world of color—jarringly switching to a black
and white starkness—to convey the part of the journey where the
character “went through insanity at least twice.” His ability to
ration his words in an economic fashion—as well as letting white
space and sparsity of backgrounds emphasize the intensity of certain
scenes—makes this book the most compelling of his hardback
(non-comic) books.
So to come back to Spore, in many ways DC
editor Matt Idelson should be lauded by critics like myself for
providing such a mainstream platform for Gagne to play with such an
icon as Batman. The mantra of the industry at present is to broaden
the reading audience of comics. No one has the right formula to do
so, that I’ve found. But I imagine a great deal of the graphic novel
consumers who avoid superheroes like the Raelians’ clone seems to be
dodging DNA tests would appreciate a work in Gagné’s quality and
perspective.
So please realize, next time I pan something,
I’m fully willing to admit that I can be wrong. Please be sure to
check the work out for yourself, because sometimes you might find,
that which I dislike, you may very well love.
And my thanks
to Gagné, for giving me the opportunity to consider Spore in the
context of his entire body of work. Context is a great thing when
one seeks it out (or sometimes has it land in your lap).
I
hope DC (as well as Marvel, if they’re smart) find a miniseries or
some project that will pique Gagné’s interest, as Spore most clearly
has so far.
Ostrander Dispenses Some
Wisdom
Over the holiday season, at the John Ostrander message board, I posted a news item about J.K. Rowling’s kind act of reading
a then-unreleased Harry Potter book to a dying child. In his response, Ostrander said:
“Sounds
consistent with Ms. Rowling who I tend to like on a personal level
from what I've heard of her (in addition to enjoying the Potter
books). On a special I saw on TV, she said something as an author
that I thought was VERY important. She said she had received a
letter from a mother of someone who read her books with a complaint
about the latest in the series, claiming it had gotten too dark and
that she (the mother) expected Rowling to improve on this score in
subsequent books. Rowling said she wrote back, firmly advising the
mother NOT to buy any more of the books. She said that what the fans
thought of her work was vitally important to her but, as she said,
‘should they change one word of what I write? No.’ And in that I was
in complete agreement. As an author, you respect what the fans think
and feel and what they tell you about the work you do but you cannot
allow you to change what you do or it will not be yours. Writing is
not a democracy; it is a point of view. I may learn from my readers
but I cannot accept orders from them; I'm a writer and not a short
order cook. With this is a corollary: never ask an artist what
they're work is about. They can only tell you what they INTENDED it
to be.”
For readers/consumers like myself (as well as fellow
critics—professional and amateur), Ostrander’s last bit of opinion
is essential reading. We may think we know a better way to tell a
story, but at the end of the day, it’s not our story. If we think
our way is so much better, than maybe it’s time we try to write our
own tale. While the Internet is a great forum to share ideas, I
think sometimes we share too many ideas and opinions. For myself, I
know I’m glad the editor in my head stops me from posting an opinion
every once and awhile. People may (or may not) respect my opinion,
but that doesn’t mean the whole world has to have my (or anyone
else’s opinion) on everything.
Check out Mike Hawthorne
Profile
Every once and awhile a local paper will focus
on a comic book creator. What I like about the York Daily Record’s
January 3, 2003, profile of artist Mike “Three
Days In Europe” Hawthorne is that rather than making it all
about “he gets to draw comics! Kewl!”, the writer Peter Bothum
reveals the hardship of self-publishing and overall trying to
succeed in the comic book industry. I recommend everyone be sure to
check out the article as it also provides links to other projects
that Hawthorne has done or that are on the horizon. All and all, the
article is the kind of balanced (non-condescending) coverage that
the industry can appreciate.
An
Announcement
This weekend as I was writing this column as
well as juggling my other more pressing priorities as husband and
father, I came to an important realization. As much as I love
writing my column, my reviews and doing the interviews, it has
gotten to be too much. Something has to give, as I need to spend
more time away from the computer and with my family and friends.
For the time being, I will be cutting back and will begin a
biweekly schedule with this column and the ORCA Q&A. We’ll see
how it goes. As I said at the beginning of this column, I write in a
vacuum. I have no idea who will miss the frequency of either the
column or my interviews. That’s where I do need feedback. As this
experiment plays out, if you find yourself wishing I did more
interviews and less of the column (or vice versa), please let me
know at timmito@yahoo.com
I’m really receptive to feedback and I hope everyone
understands the reason behind my schedule shift. |
|